[linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great? (and on dyne:bolic work better?!)
Iain Duncan
iainduncan at telus.net
Wed Jul 13 19:15:31 UTC 2005
Me too. It worked great on both my ancient laptop and my desktop, though
I did have to modprobe snd-usb-audio to get my usb midi box detected.
I've been raving about it to everyone. It also is incredibly easy to
customize.
jaromil wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Andres Cabrera wrote:
>
>>>I've also tried dynebolic (www.dynebolic.org) and on the two systems
>>>I've tried works considerably better than agnula live and the suse live
>>>audio cd.
> wow :)
>
> for anyone interested, development of a new core foundation dyne:II
> started and is to a good point already http://devel.dynebolic.org
Is it at a point where one could customize a dyne:bolic using glibc2.3?
I seem to recall seeing on your site that the new one was a newer glibc
right?
Thanks
Iain
More information about the Linux-audio-dev
mailing list