[linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio Simply Work Great? (and on dyne:bolic work better?!)

[Iain Duncan]

> the main differences from before is that it will have a compiler inside
> and that it will be a multiuser environment.
> also i'm not going to be the only mantainer of the only branch
> available: there will be more dyne: versions.
> 
> actually the first branch out of dyne:II is the pure:dyne project that
> the people at goto10.org is planning, for a slick and efficient
> dyne:bolic with an advanced PD setup.

Jaromil, that sounds great for what we are doing with it. Glyn and I ( 
www.xornot.com ) are planning on making a custom Dyne:bolic with csound5 
and a multiuser front end for our gig software, so I would be very 
interested in seeing the advanced PD setup. Probably that will be a good 
starting point for us. Incorporating Victor Lazarrini's new csound5 
~CsoundAPI object for PD would be a good idea too.

> newer glibc with NPTL and 2.6 kernel.
> 
> I will post more technical specifications on the development pages in
> the upcoming days.

Will that be 2.6.12 patched with Ingo's RT patch? Seems to be giving me 
very good real time performance right now even with only the desktop 
preemption level.

Thanks
Iain