[linux-audio-dev] [ot] [rant] gcc, you let me down one time too many

[N Smethurst]

Chris Cannam a écrit :

>Yes, indeed, but a couple of times here I've seen observations that a 
>vector would compile to an array if optimisation was on, etc.  Since 
>we're mostly using gcc-3.3+ now, I wanted to ask if anyone is sure 
>whether that's really true.
>  
>
Since a vector is a wrapped C array (i.e. contigous), the [] operator 
compiles to the C equivalent when optimisation is turned on. The result 
is the same as a C array.

Thinking about it logically, why would the developers of a C++ standard 
library choose a different method? The std::vector is meant to be the 
C++ replacement to C arrays, so a slow down in speed would effectively 
render it useless.

However, last time I checked, GCC does not inline functions with -02 
(only with -O3), so I always specify -finline-functions when compiling.