[linux-audio-dev] OSC-Question

[martin rumori]

hi arnold,

On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:12:19PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> I had a look into Steve Harris' liblo and libOSC++. The later seems more 
> appealing to me since I am a C++-Guy.

two years ago, i added the network classes (Inet*) to libOSC++, fixed
some bugs, cleaned up a bit...  the library was used in different
projects (http://listen.gmd.de, http://www.grenzenlosefreiheit.de,
plus the wiretap thing of the original libOSC++ developers) and
appeared to be stable.

BUT: as far as i know, there is not much development ongoing at the
moment, and i ever planned some redesign for the whole library (i
don't consider using a std::string as container for an osc message as
a nice example for object oriented design...), but unfortunetaly there
wasn't enough time...

just some background information concerning libOSC++.  be sure to pick
the "fraunhofer" branch if using it.  there is a download page at
http://libosc.rumori.de

but i guess that liblo might be the better choice, it's in vivid
development and used by much more projects than libOSC++, plus the
clean and rock solid design with the steve harris (R) guarantee...

bests,

martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20050315/cfe6e0fe/attachment.pgp>