[linux-audio-dev] Aeolus and OSC - comments requested

Jesse Chappell jesse at essej.net
Thu May 12 21:55:05 UTC 2005

Fons Adriaensen wrote on Thu, 12-May-2005:

 > You also allow the client to include a return address and OSC path
 > with each request. I have my doubts about the first: it allows the
 > client to use a different address for each call, and this could create
 > significant overhead for the server, having to lookup the hostnames.
 > The OSC return path probably makes sense in a dynamic environment as SL.
I can't see why a single client would be changing its address all the time
in practice.  And a given hostname is only looked up once, and
the address info used by liblo is cached.  When I implemented
this interface liblo did not yet support the source address feature,
and it still doesn't work right on OS X for me.


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list