[linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Issues

[Taybin Rutkin]

I think that would be a non-standard extension of the current practice and wouldn't be understood by current parsers.

Taybin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen at chello.se>
Sent: May 25, 2005 3:16 AM
To: 
	The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List <linux-audio-dev at music.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Issues

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:03 +0100, Nick Dowell wrote:
> Good idea.
> 
> reverse - domain name type addresses are used quite widely now, in Java 
> for example and in all apple's latest stuff.
> 
> eg "uk.org.plugin.analogueOsc"
> 

Can we have a unique divider between the domain and product?

   foo.bar at example.com
and
   foo at bar.example.com

.. are in java both represented as

   com.example.bar.foo


Having instead, say

   com.example at bar.foo
and
   com.example.bar at foo

.. would resolve this (minor) issue.



> combined with a version number, you can correctly identify plugins no 
> matter their filename..
> 
> -n
> 
> On 20 May 2005, at 14:19, Steve Harris wrote:
> 
> > Or, we could use a system thats been demonstrated to work really 
> > well...
> > http://www.w3.org/Addressing/
> 
--