[linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2 decision points

[Lars Luthman]

On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 19:12 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> E) Bundles: no-one screamed when I suggested it, but its a bit different to
> LADSPA 1's /lib directory. Hosts would be required to allow the plugin 
> link to libraries in the bundle if they need to (this is why OPENSTEP did
> it, I guess its done by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but I dont know), which
> is a bit more work, but makes moving plugins between machines easier.

I don't really see the point in storing shared libraries in the bundle.
If you are using your own copy of a library already, why not just link
it statically?

I'm not saying that bundles are bad though.

-- 
Lars Luthman
PGP key:     http://www.student.nada.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A  E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20060422/8da81d13/attachment.pgp>