[linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2 decision points

[thockin at hockin.org]

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:05:18PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 11:56 -0700, thockin at hockin.org wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 02:22:09PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > > B) RDF syntax: RDF/Turtle seems a lot more popular in these parts than
> > > > RDF/XML. We could mandate Turtle for all LADSPA metadata.
> > > 
> > > Personally I think it's ugly and strange and arbitrary and just weird
> > > all around, but whatever.  I don't really care. :)
> > 
> > I've not made time for audio software much this past year, so discount me
> > if you will, but I agree.  I just don't see the point of metadata outside
> > the plugin.  I just don't get it.
> 
> nonono :)  I think metadata outside the plugin is without a doubt the
> right way to go.  I meant I'm just not a huge fan of the particular
> syntax of this Turtle stuff (as opposed to normal well-formed XML).
> Mostly because it means we need special tools and who knows what
> libraries to deal with it.

That's fine.  I still don't get the point of seperating the two.