[linux-audio-dev] LADSPA 2 decision points

[Dave Robillard]

On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 21:32 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:05:18PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > nonono :)  I think metadata outside the plugin is without a doubt the
> > right way to go.  I meant I'm just not a huge fan of the particular
> > syntax of this Turtle stuff (as opposed to normal well-formed XML).
> > Mostly because it means we need special tools and who knows what
> > libraries to deal with it.
> 
> you cant usefully read RDF/XML with just an XML parser anyway. It's quite
> a lot of work to transform from the XML tree to the RDF graph.
> 
> But yes, Turtle support is less widespeard than RDF/XML, but there are
> still Free/Open parsers for every language I can think of (C(++), perl,
> java, python, ruby, javascript, etc.)

As long as it's part of the SDK (and the SDK doesn't have ridiculous
requirements), I say it's fine.

Speaking of SDK, the LADSPA2 SDK should include the above, and a (strict
as possible) demolition equivalent - not to mention example plugins that
are actually correct :)

-DR-