[linux-audio-dev] Googlable "LADSPA2" names

[grae]

That's true.  But it wouldn't be the same.  The main <newname>.org
site would jump to the top, but then you'd have 5 pages of saxaphones
and sax parsers before you hit joe blow's blog about sax plugins.

Maybe its not that important.  Just my thoughts :)

On 4/27/06, Steve Harris <S.W.Harris at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:19:21 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:02:20AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> >
> > > apa chap clap eep fap ladspa2 pea peep peeper rap sax wasap xap
> > >
> > > To see if theres early consensus lets run a condorcet vote on the options.
> > > If everyone posts thier preference in order seperated by >, eg.
> > >     foo>bar>baz
> >
> > ladspa2>sap>xap>peep>peeper>sax>fap>eep>clap>chap>apa>rap>pea>wasap>rap
> >
> > everything but ladspa(2) is a google nightmare.
>
> Yeah, but it wont be after we have some web presence. A slotdot post and
> mention in LWN is all it needs to be highly ranked in google.
>
> - Steve
>