[linux-audio-dev] LADSPA processing: ams, om, ... Anything else?

[Lars Luthman]

On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 21:26 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
> 
> - 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed precision,
>   sliders are not sufficient,
> - 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is under
>    development).

The engine has been rock solid for me for the last month or so (modulo a
few bugs that has been fixed quickly). What sort of crashes are you
seeing?


> Anything else?

I think Csound supports LADSPAs.

-- 
Lars Luthman
PGP key:     http://www.student.nada.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A  E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20060316/2ad972aa/attachment.pgp>