[LAD] Golden Ears wanted
fons at kokkinizita.net
Tue Aug 7 08:25:20 UTC 2007
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:36:31AM +0300, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> Why did you resample to 48 kHz instead of 96 kHz?
- It's a very common case.
- It's a considerably more difficult one than upsampling to 96 kHz.
If you work out where the first aliased image ends up, then for
44->48 most of it is in the audible range, while for 44->96 all
of it ends up above 22 kHz.
- My web space is limited, and 96 kHz would double the files sizes !
> I'd imagine the differences would show up better that way,
Considering the second point above, it's quite the inverse.
Follie! Follie! Delirio vano è questo !
More information about the Linux-audio-dev