[LAD] "enhanced event port" LV2 extension proposal
Dave Robillard
drobilla at connect.carleton.ca
Sat Dec 1 18:38:58 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 10:42 +0000, Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> Dave Robillard wrote:
>
> > Sigh. In /this case/ they are the same, because the data directly
> > follows
>
> Sort it out with gcc, not with me :)
The struct does not actually exist, its sizeof is irrelevant.
> And if you meant that event->buf is still a pointer, buf the value of
> event->buf will always be (&buf)+1
[snip]
The data is at &buf. That's all. The sole significance of that struct
member is that the data is at &buf. It doesn't matter in any way
whatsoever what that struct member is. Honest. ;)
Read the comment... the buffer format couldn't be more clear.
-DR-
More information about the Linux-audio-dev
mailing list