[LAD] [Jackit-devel] [PATCH] jack dbus and logs improvement

Dave Robillard dave at drobilla.net
Tue Dec 18 21:39:13 UTC 2007

On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:56 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
> Krzysztof Foltman <wdev at foltman.com> writes:
> > Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to hear what other ppl think about this. It works for me both
> >> ways. If most ppl like to have two modes merged in one executable just
> >> to see jackd is running not jackdbus, so be it, I'll merge those changes
> >> into dbus patch.
> >
> > I'm definitely in favour of the merge. The previous solution (old jackd,
> >  new jackdbus) was definitely confusing to me. While I understand the
> > distinction now, it wasn't obvious at first.
> So having jackd behave in orthagonal way is not confusing? Like, jackd
> process is running, why my apps cannot connect?!?!?


If apps can't connect to a running jackd, then that is a bug with the
d-bus stuff regardless of what the executable is called.


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list