[LAD] [ANN] LV2 beta3

[Steve Harris]

On 9 May 2007, at 17:19, Dave Robillard wrote:
>
>> Optional support for fundament things is not a solution.
>
> None of the things you have mentioned have any /actual/ reason to  
> go in
> LV2 itself, except the sample rate issue which does need to be figured
> out.  I'm for making it a rational number or double; locking it as an
> int for no reason when there's any reason for something better at  
> all is
> short-sighted.
>
> I do think I vaguely remember some reason why floating point sample
> rates aren't good though.... ?

Probably, but sometimes you just have to be realistic. I'm happy to  
go with double sample rates if no one screams. I've had a quick look  
at my code and it should be an easy transition - the most common  
thing I do with the sample rate is cast it to a float or double and  
store it somewhere anyway.

- Steve