[LAD] [ANN] LV2 beta3

Thorsten Wilms t_w_ at freenet.de
Thu May 10 07:41:49 UTC 2007

On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:14:05PM -0400, Thomas Vecchione wrote:

> >Either way, everything just works (or not) as it should.
> >
> Not to someone not familiar with the internals of how LV2 works.  As an 
> example(I hate to bring up) how many people do you think could tell you 
> how the ineternals of a VST program work.  Heck how many do you think 
> have an even basic idea of computer programming, much less tell you the 
> above.

What has understanding internals to do with this?
All that will need to be understood is that is-an-LV2 is not 
enough to describe a plugin or host.

> Again for a programmer and specifically someone familiar with how LV2 
> works, that is fine.  For someone that has no concept of programming, 
> and just want something that works when(To them) it is supposed to, this 
> is a huge screwup that can be fixed relatively easily to be honest.

Fixed relatively easy how?

> Once again, this is not about me I am mentioning this.  This is for the 
> half dozen people(As of right now, obviously not counting those that I 
> have gotten used to linux and how things work that might start again) 
> that still come to me wondering why something doesn't 'just work'.

Do you propose to not have a plugin standard that can be extended for 
various current and possible future needs to avoid some possible user 

Shall all hosts be forced to support all extensions available so 
that a sample editor would have to "support" MIDI plugins?

Thorsten Wilms

Thorwil's Design for Free Software:

More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list