[LAD] LV2 realtime safe memory pool extension

[Nedko Arnaudov]

David Olofson <david at olofson.net> writes:

>> Also most lock free algorithms are patented so this can be point of
>> host supporting only one feature set.
>
> You shouldn't need any lock-free constructs, unless I'm missing 
> something... Is it a requirement that real time safe allocations can 
> be done in other threads than the real time audio thread?

You dont missin anything. I think you are right about lock-free
algorithms in rt-safe memory manager. I said a non-sense.

-- 
Nedko Arnaudov