[LAD] LV2 realtime safe memory pool extension
nedko at arnaudov.name
Fri Nov 9 09:14:18 UTC 2007
David Olofson <david at olofson.net> writes:
>> Also most lock free algorithms are patented so this can be point of
>> host supporting only one feature set.
> You shouldn't need any lock-free constructs, unless I'm missing
> something... Is it a requirement that real time safe allocations can
> be done in other threads than the real time audio thread?
You dont missin anything. I think you are right about lock-free
algorithms in rt-safe memory manager. I said a non-sense.
More information about the Linux-audio-dev