[LAD] "enhanced event port" LV2 extension proposal
wdev at foltman.com
Fri Nov 30 12:55:25 UTC 2007
Lars Luthman wrote:
> non-standard hacks in a specification. But with the current event header
> proposal we don't have a pointer _or_ a flexible array member in it, so
> this discussion is sort of pointless.
So, basically, we have a choice between:
uint32_t timestamp; // 16:16
// type X-specific data here (be it a pointer, or in-place data, or
// size must be an integer multiple of 8 bytes
and different variants of:
// pointer to data or inline data array here
which - I believe - Dave seems to favour.
More information about the Linux-audio-dev