A common plugin repository (WAS:Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?)

[Stefano D'Angelo]

2007/9/13, Krzysztof Foltman <wdev at foltman.com>:
> Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>
> > I'd say package format (.rpm, .deb, etc), OS distribution (Ubuntu,
> > OpenSUSE, etc.), CPU architecture (ix86, x86_64, etc.)
>
> I guess one could think of adding the subarchitecture (as in: p3, p4)
> and optimization target too. The difference between subarchitecture and
> optimization target would be same as difference between -mcpu and -mtune
> gcc options.

Well... yes. But I don't know if it would work well with a regular
package manager (in terms of packaging work, updates, etc.).

Stefano