A common plugin repository (WAS:Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?)

Stefano D'Angelo zanga.mail at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 15:40:47 UTC 2007

2007/9/13, Krzysztof Foltman <wdev at foltman.com>:
> Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> > I'd say package format (.rpm, .deb, etc), OS distribution (Ubuntu,
> > OpenSUSE, etc.), CPU architecture (ix86, x86_64, etc.)
> I guess one could think of adding the subarchitecture (as in: p3, p4)
> and optimization target too. The difference between subarchitecture and
> optimization target would be same as difference between -mcpu and -mtune
> gcc options.

Well... yes. But I don't know if it would work well with a regular
package manager (in terms of packaging work, updates, etc.).


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list