[LAD] [Fwd: Re: Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3]

[Paul Davis]

On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:23 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> I'm assuming you meant to post this to the list, Paul.
> 
> In reply to your comment:
> 
> One of the motives behind jack-dbus is that a JACK control application
> shouldn't have to be RT capable since it's not processing any
> realtime-sensitive data anyway. From a technical perspective, could
> libjack be extended with such a non realtime control API?

there are many parts of the JACK API that are not RT-bound. in fact,
basically *all* of it except for a clients process() callback, which a
client is not required to register.