[LAD] alsa and OSS (again?)

[victor]

Ok: my next question is, given that a software has native
alsa support, Jack support, do we need to put some effort into
adding 1) pulse audio support and 2) OSS support?
Is that a good idea or is it just a waste of time?

Victor
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jay Vaughan" <jayv at synth.net>
To: <linux-audio-dev at lists.linuxaudio.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] alsa and OSS (again?)


>>> Does this mean that pulseaudio is preferred to Jack?
>>
>> For desktop and user applications yes, for professional audio no.
>>
> 
> 
> There should be no distinction.  The fact that there is, means that  
> the designs are broken.  Audio should just plain work - period.
> 
> ;
> --
> Jay Vaughan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev