[LAD] LV2 "isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer

[Lars Luthman]

On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 00:18 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. Januar 2008 21:58:24 schrieb Lars Luthman:
> > On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 22:47 +0100, Benno Senoner wrote:
> > > Yes I agree with what you said,
> > >  but better to start the discussion with them now because
> > > we will not know if and when if will become free software.
> >
> > Until it actually becomes free software I'm not interested in it at all.
> 
> Good you let us know, but this is not about Reaper, it's about LV2 and whether 
> it could be improved.
> 
> BTW there were rumours Reaper might become open source one day. But as you 
> might imagine, such a process would presumably happen gently step by step, so 
> that kind of attitude could really destroy the whole process.

The mail i replied to was about Reaper.

But I really doubt that the authors of a piece of software that I
haven't even used would care about my attitude, or lack thereof, when
deciding what to do with their code. 


--ll
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20080122/968dff22/attachment.pgp>