[LAD] LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer

Arnold Krille arnold at arnoldarts.de
Thu Jan 24 21:04:34 UTC 2008


Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 schrieb Krzysztof Foltman:
> Paul Davis wrote:
> > You read it wrong. For two different reasons. First, the same mistake
> > than Arnold made earlier. The GPL (whatever version) is the text that
> > lays out the terms of a license. Anyone can refer to this text but then
> > add exceptions, extensions. I can even say "Its licensed under the terms
> > of GPLv3 excluding every clause, plus the follow paragraph...".
> Well, what's more, at least one well known project from Free Software
> Foundation uses exactly that: GPL plus "special exception" changing the
> conditions slightly (allowing for use in other software without making
> them covered by GPL).
> I think it may be a good reason to think that such practices are
> allowed/approved by FSF.

That is called the LGPL...

Arnold
-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your 
administrator to do so...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20080124/b38f6136/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list