[LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH as a D-Bus service

[Juuso Alasuutari]

On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:09:55 Bob Ham wrote:
> > In a debug version, it could be desirable, but for "production" use
> > (sorry for webspeak) it is unacceptable. It should be as fault-tolerant
> > as possible in those situations.
>
> Yes, you're right, JACK should be as fault tolerant as possible :-)

I believe everyone on this list agrees on that. Would you have any ideas for 
improving the current situation? I have the impression that JACK should be 
able to produce a lot more debug on demand than it currently does; maybe this 
could ease the bug hunting?

Juuso