[LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer)

[pete shorthose]

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:25:31 -0500
Dave Robillard <dave at drobilla.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 03:16 +0000, Christian
> Schoenebeck wrote:
> > So get it: there is NOT only one definition
> > of the term "open source" when standing
> > alone. Like with many unspecific short terms,
> > different people have different opinions of
> > those short terms.
> 
> Yours just coincidentally is shared by
> virtually nobody

did you just presume to speak for virtually
everybody?

> and it just so happens that
> this arbitrary definiton matches exactly your
> software which you wish to call 'open source'
> for PR reasons.

virtually nobody cares what you think.
how's that?

cheers,
pete.