[LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer)

pete shorthose zenadsl6252 at zen.co.uk
Wed Jan 30 18:52:34 UTC 2008


On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:11:55 -0500
Dave Robillard <dave at drobilla.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 02:24 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:18:00 -0500
> > Dave Robillard <dave at drobilla.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 21:39 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:13:02 -0500
> > > > Dave Robillard <dave at drobilla.net> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:28 +0000, pete
> > > > > shorthose wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:44:46 -0500
> > > > > > Dave Robillard <dave at drobilla.net> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:22 +0000, pete
> > > > > > > shorthose wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:39 -0500
> > > > > > > > Dave Robillard <dave at drobilla.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > now, if you feel the need, concoct some juicy
> > > > combination of pejoratives and craft them into
> > > > a rejoinder. it's a free shot at the basket
> > > > because i'm well and truly done talking to you.
> > > > i might as well be debating an ATM.
> > > 
> > > No, that's quite alright.  You began the attacks, you may finish them.
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure how you can possibly justify the ridiculous argument above
> > > given the nature of how this sub-thread began (i.e. you attacking me).
> > 
> > bull. you used the ad populum logical fallacy to defend your favoured interpretation
> > of a contentious term. i used that same logical fallacy against you because
> > it was false. obviously, as a natural consequence of refuting me, you would refute 
> > your earlier argument.
> 
> Um.  When the point being made is literally that most people think X, ad
> populum is obviously not a fallacy.  

unfortunately for me, you are quite right. but only about that.
now, as i stand by everything else i said, and as you neither dealt with it
nor conceded anything, we don't actually seem to be arguing about anything
at all any more.
looks like we are both done.

cheers,
pete.



More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list