[LAD] Let's kill EPAMP???

[Arnold Krille]

Am Montag, 2. Juni 2008 schrieb Stefano D'Angelo:
> #4. Support for time stretching when using non real-time audio sources.

Time-stretching is an effect and therefor a plugin! Otherwise you will get 
_very_ bad audio because every plugin-author will implement its own 
time-stretching with very varying results.

You probably mean that the system should support that the number of 
input-samples is different than the number of output-samples (per plugin and 
process()-run). This requires that the plugins themself need to tell the host 
how many samples of output result from how many samples of input.
Which would actually be a good thing for an api.

And why is time-stretching limited to non-realtime audio?

Arnold
-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your 
administrator to do so...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20080602/867ca457/attachment.pgp>