[LAD] FW: [piksel] The future of videojack ?

[Nedko Arnaudov]

"Stephen Sinclair" <radarsat1 at gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Juuso Alasuutari
> <juuso.alasuutari at gmail.com> wrote:
>>  The audio callback API wouldn't need to be changed in any way. Video
>>  streaming capabilities would require adding a smallish additional API.
>
> I hope it's not too presumptuous, since I know nothing about JACK, but
> if going to the trouble of adding video support, why not make it more
> general and allow transport of _any_ data with audio-sample accuracy?
> I can think of a couple of useful reasons for it...
>
> (embedding OSC packets, audio-synchronized haptics, etc..)

OSC is not periodic, audio and video is. So if we add OSC (and/or
generic event ports), IMHO it would be closer to current MIDI port
semantics.

-- 
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20080507/93138ad2/attachment.pgp>