[LAD] Fwd: Fw: Re: At the hands of Professor Keller and Raymond

[nescivi]

On Wednesday 29 July 2009 00:49:09 David Robillard wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 00:04 -0400, laseray at gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:18:03 David Robillard wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:01 -0400, laseray at gmail.com wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote:
> > > > > at revision 12, this project is (in my non-lawyer non-authoritative
> > > > > opinion, etc), very obviously and correctly licensed under the GPL
> > > > > version 2 or later, in the way recommended by the FSF.
> > > >
> > > > The raw code seems okay over there. Running ant to make a dist
> > > > package results in something that violates the GPL if a user were
> > > > to distribute it.
> > >
> > > No, it does not, and even if it did, this would not be a GPL violation
> > > on Prof. Keller's part.
> >
> > Yes, it does. I just did it a little while ago. There is no license file
> > in it. I checked the dist/zip targets.

so that is unfortunate, and should be corrected to avoid confusion.
But, it would still be the user distributing the binary violating and not 
Keller.

sincerely,
Marije