[LAD] Impro-Visor created on sourceforge

Patrick Shirkey pshirkey at boosthardware.com
Sat Aug 8 19:49:08 UTC 2009


On 08/09/2009 05:44 AM, drew Roberts wrote:
> On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>    
>> Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork?  Is there a guide
>> that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
>> making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
>> forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
>> result of your efforts?
>>      
>
> Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this point
> at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists is the
> original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along with new text
> documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from checking either of the
> projects.)
>
>    


So this is a pre fork or a split or a bend but not an outright fork?

IMO, it's so close to a fork as to be almost negligible.

It's all the ground work in place but none of the follow through.

It's like a "psyche" intended to frighten the recipient without actually 
doing anything specific?





Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd




> all the best,
>
> drew
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>    
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20090809/069240f9/attachment.html>


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list