[LAD] Impro-Visor created on sourceforge

[Raymond Martin]

On Saturday 08 August 2009 16:04:43 you wrote:
> On 08/09/2009 06:10 AM, Raymond Martin wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:49:08 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> >> On 08/09/2009 05:44 AM, drew Roberts wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> >>>> Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork?  Is there a guide
> >>>> that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required
> >>>> for making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
> >>>> forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
> >>>> result of your efforts?
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this
> >>> point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists
> >>> is the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along
> >>> with new text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from
> >>> checking either of the projects.)
> >>
> >> So this is a pre fork or a split or a bend but not an outright fork?
> >>
> >> IMO, it's so close to a fork as to be almost negligible.
> >>
> >> It's all the ground work in place but none of the follow through.
> >>
> >> It's like a "psyche" intended to frighten the recipient without actually
> >> doing anything specific?
> >
> > Yeah, the ground shakes and you get all frightened, but not much happens,
> > yet!
> >
> > The Impro-Visor code is out and on SF, so it worked, didn't it.
>
> If that was your intention then yes.
>
> So now you are the official watchdog of the improvisor code? If they
> step out of line again you will be right there to get them back on track
> even if you have to force the issue with your cape and a trusty spork at
> your side?
>

I also have a little hickory stick for application as needed.

Whip it good, dana nana nah!

Raymond