[LAD] LADI

Gabriel M. Beddingfield gabriel at teuton.org
Sun Dec 20 05:25:08 UTC 2009



On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, fons at kokkinizita.net wrote:

>> 1) The 'one app with plugins' group. People who are focusing on one big
>> app, extended by plugins (Ardour, Qtractor, LV2/DSSI). This group
>> doesn't have much interest in a session handler.
>
> And quite probably the authors of these apps are not very
> motivated to make them compatible with session handlers.

Over the past few months I've decided that I'm in group #1. 
Session management is good... but it requires /some/ level 
of consensus.  I think LAD (at present) is too hostile to 
achieve this without some sort of "politician" showing up to 
unify the devs (and it ain't me, babe).

That said, I'm open to adding session management to my 
applications and would love it if session management could 
succeed.

> 4. And there's group 4, or maybe that group is just me.
> If there are others I'd like to know. For group 4:

When I'm not in group 1, I'm hanging out in group 4. 
Inter-host and headless session management is important to 
me, too.

I really do hope that Fons releases his code. :-)

-gabriel



More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list