[LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus...
chr.ohm at gmx.net
Tue May 19 13:44:11 UTC 2009
On Tuesday, 19 May 2009 at 10:38, Stéphane Letz wrote:
> 4) A possible proposed solution was to define 2 completely separated
> packages for jack2 : the "classic" one would package the "jackd"
> incarnation and allow Qjackctl and legacy control applications to be
> used with it. The "D-Bus" one would package the "jackdbus"
> incarnation, and provide D-Bus bas control applications (patchage,
> ladi tools....).
Wouldn't a dbus-based control application jackd work? I.e. a wrapper around the
dbus jack that behaves like the old jackd? (It seems like the obvious solution
to me, but I haven't read that much of this discussion, just part of what was
on this list, so if this is the stupid kind of obvious, just ignore me.)
More information about the Linux-audio-dev