[LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments
pshirkey at boosthardware.com
Tue May 19 18:23:45 UTC 2009
I find it hard to see how you actually understand Linux audio. I get the
impression that you have almost tried but instead have persistently
trolled on this point since you arrived.
The above is a "full stop" of Ralfs dialog, I say this just in case
there is a possible alternative that seems to make sense for a temporary
Please stop with your destabilising crap.
- For reference : This must be the 50th time Ralf has been asked to stop
dissing Linux Audio...
Eventually someone from the mass media will see through his bs (and M$
fud). Until that time we are at his merciful prerogative to make Linux
audio look like he and his cronies give a shit. I have to wonder tho,
That if he is prepared to spend this much time dissing Linux audio,
then his boosses must be really scared about the results as they are
obviously well aware of how close we are to the existing sytem that has
been devised by the "Geniuses" at ...(insert your favorite sound system
Ralf. I would really love to hear a conclusive rebuttal from you.. After
four years. (is it really that long?) I think we are owed a conclusive
Boost Hardware Ltd
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Bob Ham wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 18:27 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:49:58PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote:
>>>> I have to say, I think this is really out of line, Fons. Implying free
>>>> software developers are theives because they've changed something and
>>>> you don't like it is quite extraordinary.
>>> I did not imply such a thing. You are completely
>>> missing the point.
>> Such is the danger of analogies. What was the point?
> Running gag: Metaphors don't work :D.
> I wish you all get your views reconciled. Tonight I'll try to make music
> with Linux again (by using jack).
> Good luck to you, good luck to myself,
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev at lists.linuxaudio.org
More information about the Linux-audio-dev