[LAD] JACK Graph Internal Latency? (was Re: A small article ...)
Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net
Thu Apr 29 09:25:29 UTC 2010
Louigi Verona wrote:
> Hey guys!
>
> I was the one who tested this for Mike. I used Qtractor and Rakarrack.
> In Qtractor I had Audio track 1 and Audio track 2.
> Signal from track 1 was routed into Rakarrack and then into track 2.
>
> The latency is there and quite audible.
>
> Louigi.
Maybe it has nothing to do with this:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [LAD] JACK Graph Internal Latency? (was Re: A small
article ...)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:17:31 +0200
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net>
To: michael noble <looplog at gmail.com>
CC: linux-audio-dev at lists.linuxaudio.org
References:
<s2q339c30111004281945ke03e953dp404e0b63e42b563d at mail.gmail.com>
<m2yeb4b5e1d1004282041j67fd5bcek60636d345c38ba0f at mail.gmail.com>
<l2y339c30111004282258rfd24b69bo3f86bbd54235ff12 at mail.gmail.com>
<p2p339c30111004290202u6fec7788ka4b038632ac42c87 at mail.gmail.com>
[snip]
I also wonder why JACK's zero-copy implementation could cause issues
for
audio apps. There was an issue for Qtractor, anyway, until today I
believed that there is no latency when using JACK in any way, excluded
connections regarding to the sound card.
I never noticed a latency, but maybe it's because I used this insert
connections for time related FX only, e.g. flanger and delay.
Interesting to read about latency I never was able to hear.
Ralf
But anyway, what version of Qtractor do you use? There was an issue
related to a supposed zero-copy implementation for outdated versions of
Qtractor, that a long time ago was fixed in SVN or even in the
previously used CVS.
Ralf
More information about the Linux-audio-dev
mailing list