[LAD] midi beat clock
pedro.lopez.cabanillas at gmail.com
Sat Feb 20 18:09:26 UTC 2010
On Saturday, February 20, 2010, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> On 02/20/2010 01:00 AM, Tim E. Real wrote:
> > On February 19, 2010 07:51:58 pm Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> >> On 02/20/2010 12:40 AM, m.wolkstein at gmx.de wrote:
> >>> here the mbc specs.
> >>> midi beat clock defines the following real time messages:
> >>> * clock (decimal 248, hex 0xF8)
> >>> * tick (decimal 249, hex 0xF9)
> > It also transmits them. It also recognizes tick but doesn't use it.
> > From what I understand, tick is nothing more than a periodic 'keep alive'
> > signal, not a sync signal. I could be wrong though...
> this "tick" signal (0xf9) must be (is it?) some leftover from ancient
> midi times, if ever used effectively. i fail to recognize its use but
> being just, uh,... _undesirable_ noise:)
> i'll turn off
0xf9 is Undefined (Reserved), according to:
Or the MIDI specification 1.0, which is embedded in many books, like this one:
The "keep alive" message is 0xfe (dec. 254) Active Sensing. And by the way,
here is another mirror of the Jeff Glatt's MIDI docs:
It is an useful site, because the official MIDI specification is not published
online my midi.org, but it is not an official source. I would like to know
the origin of this "tick" 0xf9 message. Is it an addition from some
More information about the Linux-audio-dev