[LAD] [LAU] Help on rubberband

[gerald mwangi]

Thanx, I'll look at the solution.
Gerald 

On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 18:52 +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:40 PM, gerald mwangi <gerald.mwangi at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi, has someone looked at the code? I really need an answer to the question.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't notice this earlier on LAD because the subject line
> ("Is TerminatorX development stalled?") bore no relationship to the
> substance of the query.  No slight to TerminatorX intended, but I
> wouldn't normally look at messages on LAD about it!
> 
> > I have a question to for the devs out there though: It seems to me that i
> > have to run process() a few times with a fixed blocksize before,
> > getRequiredSamples() returns something >0 in Realtime-mode. All other
> > options are default options. Is this true?
> 
> You have to supply process() with a certain amount of data before
> anything becomes available at output, yes.  If you are using a small
> fixed block size, then yes it is true that you will likely have to
> call process() several times.  You might like to consider querying
> getLatency() first, after setting the initial ratios, and "priming"
> the stretcher with that number of zeroed samples before you start.
> 
> 
> Chris


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20100113/dc4a3919/attachment.html>