[LAD] random curiosity

[cal]

Arnold Krille wrote:
> [ ... ]
> I don't (yet) get the reason for doing this. If the global seed is initiated 
> with time() it is the same as if each notes seed is initiated with time(), the 
> numbers are still random beginning from that seed. The only problems I can see 
> is when the random numbers are correlated resulting with per-note correlation 
> of for example always the a of the adsr being to short. A problem that is 
> easily solved when multiple notes get their numbers from the same seed 
> effectively randomizing the access to that seed and thus overcoming the 
> correlation...

I can't come up with any better response than ... sounds feasible.