[LAD] minimal LV2

[fons at kokkinizita.net]

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:09:12AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:

> On 2010-06-13, at 00:00, fons at kokkinizita.net wrote:
>
> > Half of the URLs quoted above refer to inexistent pages.
> 
> That's bad karma, but not essential.
> 
> > What is the purpose of 'http://' in that case ?
> 
> They're just symbols.

OK, let me rephrase the question: why are such ambiguous
or misleading 'symbols' being used ?

And since I'm now talking to one of the experts: 

Can an LV2 extension redefine everything except the
mimimum required for discovery ? This includes the
way ports are described, the way the host is supposed
to call the plugin etc. ?

Ciao,

-- 
FA

O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !