[LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?

Arnold Krille arnold at arnoldarts.de
Tue Jul 12 23:31:24 UTC 2011


On Tuesday 12 July 2011 22:20:48 Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 09:45 PM, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > Thinking it over and going back over some references and earlier
> > threads here (e.g. much earlier ones from Olivier et al) it does seem
> > that this should be enough.  This particular situation isn't so
> > complicated after all.  I think the more I read earlier during this
> > thread (and reading around) generally about memory ordering, the more
> > I was beginning to feel as if the entire subject was a source of only
> > trouble.
> 
> Quite interestingly, I have noticed that discussions about memory barriers
> are often somehow endless.

You mean there should be a barrier to discussions about memory barriers?

Sorry, couldn't resist...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20110713/2a59c17a/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list