[LAD] accepted use of sync callback

[Paul Davis]

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, torbenh <torbenh at gmx.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:45:51PM +0100, Lieven Moors wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> I'm not sure my program would satisfy the realtime constraint.
>> But I'll have a look at both options again...
>
> using the sync callback to detect a skip in the transport is
> not adequate usage of it.

i didn't interpret his question as meaning that, but yeah, OK.