[LAD] jackmixdesk undefined references

Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter audio-mobster at gmx.de
Thu Apr 19 18:01:43 UTC 2012


Am 19.04.2012 19:32, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 07:09:52PM +0200, Ulrich-Lorenz Schlüter wrote:
>
>>> install libphat-dev package (if ubuntu)
>>>
>>> post output of
>>>
>>> ls /usr/lib/libph*
>>> ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libph*
>>>
>>> cat /etc/ld.so.conf
>>> cat /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*
>>>
>> I need a resizeable phat knob for my project, jackmixdesk.
> Glad you mention this. Right after posting the same mail three times in
> a row. ;)
>
>> I want to make my this project available for all users without
>> fumbling, so I don't want a dependency on the development package of
>> phat.
> Speaking with my Debian hat on, I suggest you simply specify any
> external requirements in the README and trust the distribution to get it
> right.
>
> The other approach is to use an embedded copy of phat, but we (Debian)
> usually don't like this approach and would probably strip it anyway.
>
> There are pros and cons to embedded copies:
>
>    + known to work
>    + easy installation, since self-contained
>
>    - increased memory footprint
>    - additional maintenance overhead (e.g., security fixes)
>
>
>
>> Phat dev is even uninstallable for gentoo right now.
> Tell them, and they'll fix it. If nobody knows about this, it would
> remain broken forever.
>
>
>
> Just my €0.02
>
Really sorry for that triple post. I did not receive my first two mails
back from the list, only a "message rejected" and really really had some
impatience.

I reported the phat problem at Gentoo bugzilla because it's an ebuild
bug afaik, it was closed as invalid and I was told, this is not a
support forum. From the pro-audio list there is no response. Okay wrong
order, list first then bugzilla!

Shouldn't be such a problem to see if there is something wrong with my
build system for someone who's more common with autogen than me.

Sincerely

Uli




More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list