[LAD] changes in gcc

[Paul Davis]

technically the first order (the one that fails) was always wrong.

its unfortunate that at least a generation or two of developers got
used to the fact that it was permitted.

On 4/29/12, Emanuel Rumpf <xbran at web.de> wrote:
> Now ... isn't this a bit frustrating, if scripts stop to work after
> only 5 years ??
>
> I tried to compile ladspa-sdk, which failed.
> As I found out, it is due to (nowadays) invalid argument order:
>
> failed:
> $(CC) $(CFLAGS)  $(LIBRARIES)   -o ../bin/listplugins   listplugins.o
>
> works:
> $(CC) $(CFLAGS)     -o ../bin/listplugins   listplugins.o     $(LIBRARIES)
>
> gcc 4.6.3
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>