[LAD] Possible gpl validation

[hermann]

Am Sonntag, den 29.04.2012, 11:07 -0400 schrieb Paul Davis:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, hermann <brummer- at web.de> wrote:
> 
> > Is anyone here on the list knowing what is to do now, what could we do
> > to make the provider aware that he must offer the source in the same way
> > then the binary's,
> 
> this part is not quite true. its generally accepted that as long as
> the source is freel available from an identifiable online location,
> then notifying people who received the binaries of their rights and
> the location from which the source can be obtained is sufficient *if
> there are no modifications*

But he fail already by notify people of there rights.

How could one say if there are modifications ?

Anyhow, for sure there is GPL'd software included, witch is modified,
and isn't available at a online location. 
He claim it as a modified slackware "OS" build.