[LAD] LAA list policy

[David Robillard]

On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 10:44 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> hi *!
> 
> this unfortunate announcement from nedko seems to have spawned a 
> discussion on LAA. LAA list policy used to be no follow-ups except for 
> factual corrections. the idea was to keep the traffic low for people who 
> want to stay informed but not have to wade through too much mail. (think 
> lwn.net among others.)
> 
> can i suggest that all further contributions to this LAA thread be NAKed 
> by the moderator, please? the discussion is certainly important, but it 
> should continue on LAD or LAU.

Already happened, for the record.

> that said, while i can understand nedko's POV, the initial message never 
> really belonged on LAA either. obviously, such announcements _will_ 
> cause heated discussion, so they should be made in a forum which allows 
> them.

Indeed, the cut off point now is... less than ideal.  Now the announce
list has a hanging question about what the technological problem was
with LV2 that caused this... but there isn't one.  Yay FUD.  Sigh.

An exquisitely terrible job on the part of all parties concerned.  Keep
up the good work, Internet comrades!

-d "Reply all and let God sort 'em out" r
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20120824/c46d4880/attachment.pgp>