[LAD] Non Session Management

[Diego Simak]

Thank you, I will try to bite the source code ;-)

I want to say that I was trying NSM yesterday and I'm very impressed by
it's simplicity and (a no minor point) it's desing from the graphical point
of view.
I want to say that I'm very impressed by the thoroughness of the documentation,
something that I always admire.

>From the **USER** point of view I had tried Jack Session and LASH (a long
time ago when it was a requirement with FST) and by now NSM (a bit hasty
decision) is in the 1st place.


Maybe now it's the time that people involved in LAD (I'm just a user with a
little code experience, but I can help in any way) just try to
document the advantages
and disadvantages about Jack-session, LASH, LADISH, Scripts, NSM in
http://jackaudio.org/persistent_connections, or maybe in the Jack Wiki just
like the Jack1 and Jack2 comparison document that was included some time
ago.

I think that it could help devs and users as well to get a picture of the
current Session Managment world in JACK.


Thanks for this great peace of software.

Diego


2012/3/26 Emanuel Rumpf <xbran at web.de>

> Am 26. März 2012 22:17 schrieb Diego Simak <diego.simak at gmail.com>:
> >
> > is there any document where to read more about NSM other than
> > http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/ ?
> >
> There is
> http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html
>
> In the source package, there is some documentation too !
> Finally there is always the source code :)
>
> > Thanks for your help.
> > Diego
> >
> Thanks for interest.
>
> --
> E.R.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20120326/5c86efc8/attachment.html>