[LAD] Interoperability between session management systems

hermann meyer brummer- at web.de
Sun Feb 24 05:13:41 UTC 2013

Am 24.02.2013 06:02, schrieb J. Liles:
>     I stated it out already in a other thread: without ever been
>     released as NSM (means available as tarball, or what ever, with
>     ONLY NSM included), I wouldn't support it.
> This is stupid. What difference does it make what other programs are 
> in the source repository? Distributions can and should package the 
> programs individually. Also, NSM clients require from the NSM server 
> implementation. There is no libnsm to link to etc. This is the 
> definition of a non-issue.

So be it for you.
For me, a session management which I will support in my projects, have 
to be released as such. Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time with it. period.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20130224/5de101d8/attachment.html>

More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list