[LAD] Interoperability between session management systems
brummer- at web.de
Sun Feb 24 05:13:41 UTC 2013
Am 24.02.2013 06:02, schrieb J. Liles:
> I stated it out already in a other thread: without ever been
> released as NSM (means available as tarball, or what ever, with
> ONLY NSM included), I wouldn't support it.
> This is stupid. What difference does it make what other programs are
> in the source repository? Distributions can and should package the
> programs individually. Also, NSM clients require from the NSM server
> implementation. There is no libnsm to link to etc. This is the
> definition of a non-issue.
So be it for you.
For me, a session management which I will support in my projects, have
to be released as such. Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time with it. period.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Linux-audio-dev