[LAD] 9 soundcards ?

[Paul Davis]

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:23 AM Manuel Haible <lacuna_ at gmx.net> wrote:

>
> I am in a love-hate relation with digital audio processing,
> never experienced a converter in person that is comparable to an
> all-analog chain.
> Speacially the very highs and 3Dness.
>

I suspect you've never double-blind tested this. If you have, good for you.

And I guess there is no mastering-studio running 48k in 2020, no offence
> intended.
>

This proves absolutely nothing. Audio engineers are no more immune to
marketing BS than anyone else.


> It seems like this is taking care of the drifting clocks with a buffer and
> alignment?
>

zita_a2j will resample the stream from hardware it uses to make it match
the apparent difference in speed between the hardware it is using, and the
hardware that the JACK server is using. There will be no drift and no
alignment issues.

*The RME as master? Does that mean the hardware-clock of the RME would
> define the whole DSP-chain? Somewhere I read that RME-cards can only run as
> slave in Linux, but maybe this is outdated?*
>

This is false., and was never true.

>
> There might be some other down-sides? Phase issues ect? ... I will read
> more ...
>

All the downsides come from your desire to build a digital audio system
with 9 clocks in it. This is absolutely the wrong thing to do. The fact
that you can use software (like zita_aj2) to hide or gloss over the fact
that this is wrong doesn't stop it being wrong, and doesn't get rid of the
downsides of having 9 clocks. Rule #1 for digital audio: 1 clock.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.linuxaudio.org/archives/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20191113/6d11ab19/attachment.html>