<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26-02-2020 22:51, rosea.grammostola wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:63af4c29-1a39-18f0-9e95-b3c7d63ac30b@gmail.com"> <blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;"> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">That is an interesting trend isn't it? Certainly the presets are much more convenient to use right from rakarrack than using the plugins. I had hoped my project would be used more, but OTOH I use them and I don't regret the effort. </pre> </blockquote> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">It's interesting for sure... Imho working with all the JACK applications can be a pain on Linux, but with nsm support, the experience is much better. And then standalone applications are preferable in certain situations actually. If I would need one instance of Zynaddsubfx, I would always grab the standalone version. If I need more instances, I might switch to Carla instead and grab the plugin. On the other hand, I know people are using Rakarrack, because you can launch multiple instances and chain them together to create something interesting. </pre> </blockquote> Actually I always thought doing automation with JACK standalone applications was a huge disadvantage compared with plugins. But it's actually good possible to sent midi cc automation from a DAW to a JACK standalone softsynth like Zynaddsubfx. Or I was ignorant, or I'm still ignorant, but I don't see the problem not so much anymore. :) By the way, I've heard people are using your plugins too, so don't worry too much about it. ;) </body> </html>