<html> <head> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/vnd.ui.insecure+html;charset=utf-8"> </head> <body style="overflow-wrap:break-word; word-break: break-word;"><div class="mail_android_message" style="line-height: 1; padding: 0.5em">I am not a jack developer, but I do a lot of stuff with jack. From my perspective I can only say that this whole... thing... has scared me off. I prefer relying on bash scripts. they are reliable. Which is a shame because I do believe that you people did a good job with the tool, without me knowing the result. this is what all of you achieved with this discussion, loss of reputation. my 2c</div><div class="mail_android_quote" style="line-height: 1; padding: 0.3em"><html><body>Am 05.04.21, 21:42 schrieb Filipe Coelho <falktx@falktx.com>:</body></html><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0.8ex 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> On 05/04/21 20:31, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > > besides all the non-technical issues that I won't repeat here, i > should say that was a disgraceful move to begin with, that > (double-handledly) resulted in what you all know (and/or chose to > ignore). Sorry but what exactly the move to jackaudio.org resulted in, really? I am not joking, this is an honest and real question. And I am not talking about points that have already been answered. I believe the reasons for the move were already well explained. (Wherever people agree with them or not is a different matter) I only see you being the single developer/jack-related-person against such move. Would be interesting to hear other opinions. PS: the point of the previous email was not about you _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org <a href="https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev">https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev</a> </blockquote></div></body> </html>